Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (2024)

Physical Review B

covering condensed matter and materials physics
  • Highlights
  • Recent
  • Accepted
  • Collections
  • Authors
  • Referees
  • Search
  • Press
  • About
  • Editorial Team

Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations

Pei Wang, Ting Hu, and Erjun Kan
Phys. Rev. B 109, 235426 – Published 20 June 2024
  • Article
  • References
  • No Citing Articles
  • Supplemental Material

PDFHTMLExport Citation

Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (1)

Abstract
Authors
Article Text
  • INTRODUCTION
  • COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS
  • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
  • CONCLUSIONS
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  • Supplemental Material
    References

    Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (2)

    Abstract

    Sliding ferroelectric materials present a promising avenue for achieving out-of-plane ferroelectricity in two-dimensional systems, yet further research is imperative to elucidate their intricate microscopic mechanisms. Here, we investigated the charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations. We found that the ferroelectric polarization and conductivity can coexist at low doping concentrations. The ferroelectric polarization decreases with increasing doping concentration when introducing electrons/holes into the bilayer sliding ferroelectricity with semiconducting character. The rate of decrease is determined by the occupancy ratio of each layer in the conduction and valence bands.

    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (3)
    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (4)
    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (5)
    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (6)
    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (7)
    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (8)
    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (9)
    • Received 16 April 2024
    • Revised 17 May 2024
    • Accepted 28 May 2024

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.235426

    ©2024 American Physical Society

    1. Research Areas

    Electric polarizationElectrical propertiesElectronic structureFerroelectricityFirst-principles calculations

    Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

    Authors & Affiliations

    Pei Wang, Ting Hu*, and Erjun Kan

    • *Contact author: thu@njust.edu.cn
    • Contact author: ekan@njust.edu.cn

    Article Text (Subscription Required)

    Click to Expand

    Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

    Click to Expand

    References (Subscription Required)

    Click to Expand

    Issue

    Vol. 109, Iss. 23 — 15 June 2024

    Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (10)
    Reuse & Permissions
    Access Options
    Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (13)

    Authorization Required

    Other Options
    • Buy Article »
    • Find an Institution with the Article »

    ×

    Download & Share

    PDFExportReuse & Permissions

    ×

    Images

    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (14)

      Figure 1

      Polarization in AB stacked bilayer BN. (a) Top view illustration of the atomic arrangement for bilayer BN. To distinguish between the top and bottom layers, the atoms in the bottom layer are represented by larger radius. Nitrogen and boron atoms are shown in silver and green, respectively. (b) The side view of the differential charge density diagram. The yellow and cyan areas indicate the regions that gained and lost electrons, respectively. (c) The plane-averaged difference charge density in the z-axis direction. The two vertical lines in the diagram show where the two individual monolayers are located.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (15)

      Figure 2

      Electrostatic doping in bilayer BN. The differential charge density diagram of (a) electron and (b) hole doping obtained by subtracting the charge density of the undoped system from that of the doped system. The plane-averaged differential charge density profile at difference (c) electrons and (d) holes doping concentrations in the z-axis direction; the doping concentrations are written in the labeling and different doping concentrations are indicated by different color lines. Δρ(z)=ρdoped(z)ρundoped(z), where ρdoped(z) and ρundoped(z) are the planar average charge density for doped and undoped systems. The extent of the decrease in the top and bottom layer charge difference (black) and electrostatic potential difference (red) with (e) electron and (f) hole doping concentration.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (16)

      Figure 3

      Band structures in bilayer BN. The band structures of (a) AB-stacked bilayer BN. The illustrations on the left and right sides of the diagram are the partial charge density in the CBM and VBM, respectively. The projected band structures of (b) top and (c) bottom layer. Shades of color indicate the strength of the contribution of the top (red)/bottom (blue) layer.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (17)

      Figure 4

      (a) Bilayer sliding ferroelectric structure model with the red rectangles representing the top layer and the blue rectangles representing the bottom layer. The bilayer structure possesses an upward builtin electric field. (b) Band model near the Fermi level in the bilayer structure. The red and blue colors represent the bands of the top and bottom layers, respectively. The electron model represents the electron filling situation in the top and bottom layers when doping electrons.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (18)

      Figure 5

      Polarization in bilayer 1T′-WTe2. (a) The side view of the differential charge density. The blue and orange spheres represent W and Te atoms, respectively. The yellow and cyan areas indicate the regions that gained and lost electrons, respectively. (b) The plane-averaged differential charge density between bilayer WTe2 and two independent monolayers. Δρ(z)=ρWTe2(z)ρtop(z)ρbottom(z), where ρWTe2(z),ρtop(z), and ρbottom(z) are the charge densities of the bilayer WTe2.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (19)

      Figure 6

      Band structures of bilayer 1T′-WTe2. (a)–(c) The total band structure, the projected band structure on the top layer, and the projected band structure on the bottom layer, respectively. In the projected band structures, the shading of colors indicates the strength of the contribution of electrons from the top (red)/bottom (blue) layer.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (20)

      Figure 7

      Electrostatic doping of bilayer 1T′-WTe2. The differential charge density diagram of (a) electron and (b) hole doping obtained by subtracting the charge density of the undoped system from that of the doped system. The plane-averaged differential charge density profile at difference (c) electron and (d) hole doping concentrations in the z-axis direction; the doping concentrations are written in the labeling and different doping concentrations are indicated by different color lines. Δρ=ρdoped(z)ρundoped(z), where ρdoped(z) and ρundoped(z) are the planar average charge density for doped and undoped systems. The extent of the decrease in the top and bottom layer charge difference (black) and electrostatic potential difference (red) with (e) electron and (f) hole doping concentration.

      Reuse & Permissions

    ×

    Charge doping effect on sliding ferroelectricity by first-principles calculations (2024)

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Amb. Frankie Simonis

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6153

    Rating: 4.6 / 5 (76 voted)

    Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Amb. Frankie Simonis

    Birthday: 1998-02-19

    Address: 64841 Delmar Isle, North Wiley, OR 74073

    Phone: +17844167847676

    Job: Forward IT Agent

    Hobby: LARPing, Kitesurfing, Sewing, Digital arts, Sand art, Gardening, Dance

    Introduction: My name is Amb. Frankie Simonis, I am a hilarious, enchanting, energetic, cooperative, innocent, cute, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.